Freitag, 29. August 2003, 20:17:43
-
JWZ schreibt:
HTML must only be used for semantic markup, but that semantic markup must rigidly adhere to the pixel-accurate positioning in the spec, so that we can still design our web pages in Photoshop!
- Sam schreibt:
Dear W3C,
It's with some confusion that I watch HTML standards come out of your organization. Your focus seems to be in changing HTML from being a markup language that has some semantic, but mostly presentational tags into some bastardized form of a data storage language. SGML's already out there, kids. And let's not forget that XML is supposed to save the world from, well, everything. - Mark Pilgrim schreibt:
I've done everything the W3C has ever recommended. I migrated to CSS because they told me it would work better with the browsers and handheld devices of the future, then the browsers and handheld devices of the future came out and my site looked like shit. I migrated to XHTML 1.1 because they told me to use the latest standards available, and it bought me absolutely nothing except some MIME type headaches and (I am not making this up) Javascript incompatibilities. I migrated to semantic markup that has been around for 10 fucking years and they go and drop it.
Unsereiner ist da weitaus weniger wortgewandt. Aber die Richtung ist dieselbe.